Getting attached...
Jason Duerstock
jason@linux.aatech.com
Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:15:51 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Bob Fink LBNL wrote:
> Jason,
>
> Then I would suggest using DIGITAL-CA, NRL or CISCO until more happens in
> the the southeast.
It seems CIC is the closest to me, so I'm going to try go get hooked up
through them.
Now that I have my connecting point, according to the web page, the next
step is choosing my address. According to the page...:
> The address format from RFC 1897 is extracted below for your convenience
> in understanding the email example:
>
>
> | 3 | 5 bits | 16 bits | 8 | 24 bits | 8 | 16 bits|48 bits|
> +---+----------+----------+---+------------+---+--------+-------+
> | | |Autonomous| | IPv4 | | Subnet | Intf. |
> |010| 11111 | System |RES| Network |RES| | |
> | | | Number | | Address | | Address| ID |
> +---+----------+----------+---+------------+---+--------+-------+
>
> Note that an RFC1897 format address includes the ASN (Autonomous System
> Number) of one's provider, not an ASN that belongs to one's own site.
> (Though a provider uses its own ASN.)
This is would make my address
5F: (01011111 == first 8 bits)
0D: T
E9: +- 3561 (for MCI's ASN)
00: (RES == reserved...?)
CE: 206. \
9C: 156. > our IPv4 class C subnet
94: 148. /
00: (RES == reserved...)
This gives me the first 8 bytes, but I'm unsure as to what the subnet
address and interface ID means...it it safe to assume...:
00: T
01: +- 1 for first address on the subnet
and
00: T
00: |
00: |
00: |
00: |
01: +- interface #1
?
And for RIPE purposes, this would be come
5F0D:E900:CE9C:9400/64 ?
Assuming this is correct, should I register with RIPE first, or actually
try to get the tunnel up and running?
Thanks for the help and sorry about all the questions. :)
Jason Duerstock
jason@linux.aatech.com