comments on David Meyers's RPSL draft

Bob Fink LBNL RLFink@lbl.gov
Wed, 5 Feb 1997 08:18:06 -0800


I have seen no comments on this list regarding David Meyer's "Representing
Tunnels in RPSL" internet draft.

It is one of our working group tasks to provide feedback to the RPSL folk
on this.

Can anyone tell me what might have transpired on this topic?


Thanks,

Bob

===========================================================
From: "David M. Meyer" <meyer@network-services.uoregon.edu>
Subject: RPSL extensions for tunnels
To: 6bone@isi.edu
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 17:22:09 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-6bone@ISI.EDU
Precedence: bulk



	Folks,

	I didn't get a chance to present this in the BOF, so
	here's the draft. Any comments appreciated.

	Dave


-----------
INTERNET-DRAFT                                            David Meyer
draft-ietf-rps-tunnels-01.txt                    University of Oregon
Category: Standards Track                               November 1996


                      Representing Tunnels in RPSL


Status of this Memo

   This document provides extensions to the Routing Policy Specification
   Language [RPSL] to provide support for tunnels of various types.

Internet Drafts

   This document is an Internet-Draft.  Internet-Drafts are working
   documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
   and its working groups.  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as ``work in progress.''

   To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
   ``1id-abstracts.txt'' listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow
   Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), nic.nordu.net (Europe),
   munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim), ds.internic.net (US East Coast), or
   ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast).

Abstract

   This document specifies the language and set of semantics describing
   tunnels in the Routing Policy Specification Language (RPSL). It
   defines a new tunnel class, inet-tunnel, and a set of extensions to
   the inet-rtr class. An instance of the inet-tunnel class specifies
   endpoints for tunnels of various encapsulation types, including DVMRP
   [DVMRP], GRE [GRE], and IPv6 [IPV6].

   This memo is a product of the Routing Policy System Working Group
   (RPS) in the Operational Requirements area of the Internet Engineer-
   ing Task Force. Submit comments to <rps@isi.edu> or the author.

Introduction

   Tunneling is a fundamental networking technology that is used in a
   variety circumstances. A common use of tunneling is to incrementally
   deploy a new network layer protocol. The approach is to encapsulate
   ("tunnel") the new protocol through the existing network layer proto-
   col, usually IP. Examples of this approach include include the multi-
   cast backbone [MBONE], where multicast packets are encapsulated in IP
   packets using protocol 4 (IP in IP), and IPv6 backbone [6BONE], where
   IPv6 packets are encapsulated in IP packets using IP protocol 41
   [V6TRNS].

   Another use of tunneling is to force congruence between the existing
   (IP unicast) topology and some new topology. Due the special require-
   ments of IP multicast routing, the MBONE is also an example of this
   use of tunneling.

   This document describes extensions to RPSL to support general tunnel-
   ing mechanisms. The extensions support point to point and point to
   multipoint tunnels of encapsulation types, including DVMRP, GRE, and
   IPv6. In addition to the encapsulation, a protocol to run inside the
   tunnel can also be specified.


Extensions to the inet-rtr class

   The inet-rtr class' peer attribute is extended to describe tunnels by
   assigning a new peer type (tunnel). The tunnel peer attribute has the
   following fields:


   inet-rtr: <name>
    ...
   peer: tunnel <dest-IP1> source=<source-IP1>
                encap=<encapsulation type>
                name=<name1>
    ...
   peer: tunnel <dest-IP2> source=<source-IP2>
                encap=<encapsulation type>
                name=<name2>



   The type clause of then tunnel peer attribute describes the encapsu-
   lation on the tunnel. The defined encapsulation types are DVMRP
   [DVMRP], GRE [GRE], or IPv6 [IPV6].  The name clause refers to a tun-
   nel object (see below). If there are multiple tunnel peer attributes
   with the same name attribute, then the tunnel is a point to mul-
   tipoint tunnel. Note that a router can be the source of multiple tun-
   nels.

   Each inet-rtr tunnel peer instance has a mandatory name, source, and
   destination attributes. The tunnel source attribute must correspond
   to an ifaddr attribute for the inet-rtr instance.

   The inet-rtr instance below describes a DVMRP tunnel with source
   204.70.32.6 and destination 204.70.158.61. The tag MBONE-TUNNEL-EUG
   refers to a tunnel instance (see below). The same router has a GRE
   tunnel.


   inet-rtr: eugene-isp.nero.net
   loacalas: AS4600
   ifaddr:   204.70.32.6 masklen 30
    ...
   peer: tunnel encap=DVMRP name=MBONE-TUNNEL-EUG 204.70.158.61 204.70.32.6
   peer: tunnel encap=GRE name=GRE-TUNNEL-EUG 206.42.19.240 204.70.32.6
    ...



The inet-tunnel Class

   A tunnel is specified by an instance of the inet-tunnel class. The
   attributes of the inet-tunnel class are described below.


   inet-tunnel:     <name>
   tunnel-source:   <inet-router key>
   tunnel-sink:     <inet-router key 1>
    ...
   tunnel-sink:     <inet-router key n>
   tunnel-protocol: <protocol>
   tunnel-in: from  <inet-router key1> accept <input-filter-spec1>
   tunnel-in: from  <inet-router key2> accept <input-filter-spec2>
    ...
   tunnel-in:  from <inet-router keyn> accept <input-filter-specn>
   tunnel-out: to   <inet-router key1>
                    [action
                      [scope=<ttl1>;]
                      [boundary=<prefixn/masklen1>;]
                      [dvmrp-metric=<n>;]]
                    announce <output-filter-spec1>
   tunnel-out: to   <inet-router key2>
                    [action
                      [scope=<ttl2>;]
                      [boundary=<prefixn/masklen2>;]
                      [dvmrp-metric=<n>;]]
                    announce <output-filter-spec2>
    ...
   tunnel-out: to   <inet-router keyn>
                    [action
                      [scope=<ttln>;]
                      [boundary=<prefixn/masklenn>;]
                      [dvmrp-metric=<n>;]]
                    announce <output-filter-specn>





inet-tunnel Class Attributes



   inet-tunnel:     mandatory, single valued
   tunnel-source:   mandatory, single valued, class key
   tunnel-sink:     mandatory, single valued, class key
   tunnel-protocol: mandatory, single valued
   tunnel-in:       mandatory, multi-valued
   tunnel-out:      mandatory, multi-valued



   An instance of the inet-tunnel class describes a single tunnel
   (although the tunnel-source may be the source of multiple tunnels).
   The name attribute is a key that is used in an inet-rtr object to
   reference the tunnel object. The tunnel may be point to point or
   point to multipoint. A multipoint tunnel will have more than one
   tunnel-sink value. Each tunnel-sink must have corresponding tunnel-in
   and tunnel-out attributes. The tunnel-protocol is the protocol to run
   "inside" the tunnel. The values for tunnel-protocol include BGP,
   RIPv6, DVMRP, PIM-DM, and PIM-SM. See [SSMMC] for an application that
   uses BGP tunneled in GRE.

   The inet-tunnel class's tunnel-out attribute includes an action
   clause for which the currently defined actions include: (i).  The
   minimum IP time-to-live required for a packet to be forwarded to the
   specified endpoint (in the case of multipoint tunnels, there may be
   per endpoint scopes), (ii). A boundary attribute describes a class of
   packets that will not be forwarded through the tunnel, and (iii). A
   DVMRP metric. These attributes are particularly relevant to multicast
   routing.

   The inet-tunnel class also has routing filter specifications which
   describe filters that are appropriate for the tunnel's routing proto-
   col. In the case of DVMRP, the filter specification
    can be the list of network prefixes accepted or advertised.

   Finally, an instance of the inet-tunnel class also has all of the
   administrative fields present in an aut-num class, including guar-
   dian, admin-c, tech-c, notify, mnt-by, changed, and source.




Example


   In this example, the inet-rtr eugene-isp.nero.net has a DVMRP tunnel
   with the sink on the inet-rtr dec3800-2-fddi-0.SanFrancisco.mci.net.
   The tunnel object is called MBONE-TUNNEL-EUG. eugene-isp.nero.net
   will accept any routes. eugene-isp.nero.net will forward packets to
   the DVMRP tunnel if the packet's time-to-live is greater than or
   equal to 64. In addition, eugene-isp.nero.net will not pass any pack-
   ets that match the administrative scope boundary filter (in this
   case, 239.254.0.0/16).

   In addition, the inet-rtr eugene-isp.nero.net has a GRE tunnel
   represented by GRE-TUNNEL-EUG.
















   inet-tunnel:     MBONE-TUNNEL-EUG
   tunnel-source:   204.70.158.61
   tunnel-sink:     204.70.32.6
   tunnel-protocol: DVMRP
   tunnel-in:       from 204.70.158.61 accept ANY
   tunnel-out:      to 204.70.158.61
                    action
                       scope=64;
                       boundary={239.254.0.0/16};
                       dvmrp-metric=1;
                    announce AS-NERO-TRANSIT
   guardian:    meyer@ns.uoregon.edu
   admin-c:     DMM65
   tech-c:      DMM65
   notify:      nethelp@ns.uoregon.edu
   mnt-by:      MAINT-AS3582
   changed:     meyer@ns.uoregon.edu 961122
   source:      RADB

   inet-tunnel:     GRE-TUNNEL-EUG
   tunnel-source:   204.70.158.61
   tunnel-sink:     206.42.19.240
   tunnel-protocol: PIM-DM
   tunnel-in:       from 206.42.19.240 accept ANY
   tunnel-out:      to 206.42.19.240
                    action
                      scope=64;
                    announce ANY
   guardian:    meyer@ns.uoregon.edu
   admin-c:     DMM65
   tech-c:      DMM65
   notify:      nethelp@ns.uoregon.edu
   mnt-by:      MAINT-AS3582
   changed:     meyer@ns.uoregon.edu 961122
   source:      RADB





Security Considerations

   Security considerations are not discussed in this memo.

References
      [6BONE]  See http://www-6bone.lbl.gov/6bone/

      [DVMRP]  T. Pusateri, "Distance Vector Multicast Routing
               Protocol", draft-ietf-idmr-dvmrp-v3-03, September,
               1996.

      [GRE]    S. Hanks, T. Li, D. Farinacci, and P. Traina, "Generic
               Routing Encapsulation (GRE)", RFC1701, October, 1994.

      [IPV6]   A. Conta and S. Deering, "Generic Packet Tunneling in
               IPv6", draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-tunnel-04.txt, October,
               1996

      [MBONE]  See http://www.best.com/~prince/techinfo/misc.html

      [RPSL]   C. Alaettinoglu, et. al., "Routing Policy
               Specification Language (RPSL)",
               draft-ietf-rps-rpsl-00.txt, October, 1996.

      [SSMMC]  Y. Rekhter, "Auto route injection with tunnelling",
               NANOG, October, 1996. For additional information, see
               http://www.academ.com/nanog/oct1996/multihome.html

      [V6TRNS] R. Gilligan and E. Nordmark, "Transition Mechanisms
               for IPv6 Hosts and Routers", RFC 1933, April 1996.


Author's Address

   David Meyer
   University of Oregon
   1225 Kincaid St.
   Eugene, OR 97403

   phone:  +1 541.346.1747

   email:  meyer@ns.uoregon.edu

- end